A better Beta for the H measure of classification performance

Original by D.J Hand, C. Anagnostopolous, 2013, 12 pagesHamster_gagarin_linkedin
hamster writter This summary note was posted on 26 March 2017, by in Credit risk Finance #, #
  • The AUC can be intuitively motivated by the motivation that if one ROC curve lies strictly above another then the respective classifier performs better at all thresholds levels
  • The AUC is an aggregate or portmanteau measure equivalent to integrating over a range of possible values for the threshold
  • The error rate is simply the weighted average with the weights given by the class proportions in the population
    To overcome the deficiency of the AUC, the H measure is proposed using a fixed relative misclassification severity distribution
  • The H measure requires that the same w distribution is used for all classifiers
    In highly unbalanced situations, one regards it as more likely that misclassifications from the smaller class will be more serious that misclassifications from the larger class
  • The ratio of the costs of the two types of misclassifications errors is given by r=c/(1-c) where r measures how much more severe misclassifying a class 0 instance is than misclassifying a class 1 instance
  • The H measure should be presented with two forms of distributions: first a subjective distribution and second a universal standard distribution with a beta of Beta(2,2)